Scott of Blue Nickel Studios and I arranged a swap a while back, and here are the great artist trading cards he made for me...
There's so much detail, from little mushrooms to tiny pieced triangles, that I'll be seeing new stuff in these for ages. The edge finishes are especially cool, with twine and fabric strips inserted in the blanket stitching. I never would have thought of that!
The backs are fun, too! And Scott even matched the fabric used to wrap the ATCs (here under them) with my usual colour scheme. And threw in some great cheater-cloth-ish cat fabric!
Thanks, Scott! I sent him a bundle of vintage fabric, starting with the car fabric seen here (I hope you can use the others too, Scott!), but culling some swatches from the stash doesn't really compare to the work he clearly put into these ATCs. Maybe I'll have to experiment with a few myself and send some his way...
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
I've mentioned Charles Harper a few times before, mainly in reference to the fused bird pictures The Mother made for me several birthdays ago. The geometric, draftsmen-like quality of Harper's animal illustrations have always struck me as readily translatable into a quilt, so I tittered with delight when I saw this quilt in a 1978 issue of Lady's Circle Patchwork Quilts. Here's the caption from the magazine:
Lenore Parham borrowed from a design by Charles Harper in Ranger Rick (The National Wildlife Federation children's magazine) to create this charming wall hanging.I was at a secondhand book shop, and this picture alone moved the magazine from the "maybe" to the "definitely must have" stack. I had figured it was just a photo to go with an article on the Blue Ridge Quilters, and it wasn't till I got home that I saw they'd patterned the quilt too! So I may just have to sew up my own version. The design is especially fun since the quadrants of the circle use the same basic shape to depict three different animal as well as trees, and the quilting is quite fun too.
My first thought, though, was that something like this could never get published today (he said, pulling out the soapbox and climbing up onto it). Such "borrowing" would never get past the copyright police; a current magazine wouldn't take the chance that some lawyer somewhere might consider the quilt an infringement. I certainly understand the need for artists to protect their work, but the stifling that happens as a result of today's voracious protection of derivative works is sad. And what's the result? Other artists can't make money off the first artist's work, but lawyers and licensing agents can make a tidy sum. An original designer (or their estate, as the case would be for Harper) may or may not be willing to allow derivative quilts or other works that don't compete with the original, but the process of seeking permission is enough to kill the creative impetus. Copyrights and Copywrongs and Free Culture (available online) make the point in more detail, if you're interested. And take a look at Wendy Seltzer's article "Craft and Copyright" in volume 6 of Craft magazine for the most balanced, reasoned, sensible advice on copyright I've seen—a far cry from the many scaremongering articles that combat quilters' and crafters' myths about copyright with more myths. OK, now I can put the soapbox away.